DOCUMENTI
Corte di giustizia
T-540/15, De Capitani v. European Parliament, 2 marzo 2018, EU:T:2018:167 – LINK
C-761/18, Päivi Leino-Sandberg v. European Parliament, 21 January 2021 – LINK
Mediatore europeo
Decision on how the European Parliament dealt with a request for public access to a four-column document relating to trilogue negotiations in the adoption of the Digital Markets Act (case 253/2023/MIK) Opened on Monday | 20 March 2023 – Decision on Monday | 24 July 2023 – Institution concerned European Parliament ( Maladministration found ) – LINK
Decision of the European Ombudsman setting out proposals following her strategic inquiry OI/8/2015/JAS concerning the transparency of Trilogues – Opened on Tuesday | 26 May 2015 – Decision on Tuesday | 12 July 2016 – Institutions concerned European Parliament – LINK
BIBLIOGRAFIA
BRANDSMA G. J., Co-decision after Lisbon: The politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking, in European Union Politics, Vol. 16/2015, n. 2, pp. 300 ss. – LINK
CURTIN D., LEINO D., In Search of Transparency for EU Law Making on the Cusp of Dawn, in Common Market Law Review, 2017, p. 1673
DEL MONTE, M., SMIALOWSKI S., Understanding trilogue: Informal tripartite meetings to reach provisional agreement on legislative files, in European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 690.614, 2021
M. K. DIONIGI, C. KOOP, Investigation of informal trilogue negotiations since the Lisbon Treaty – Added value, lack of transparency and possible democratic deficit, July 2017, EESC – LINK
M. GÓMEZ-LEAL PÉREZ, El procedimiento legislativo ordinario en la práctica: los acuerdos en primera lectura, in Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, n. 52/2015, Bilbao, pp. 101 ss.
GREENWOOD, J. and ROEDERER-RYNNING, C. Taming trilogues: the EU’s law-making process in a comparative perspective, in COSTA, O. (ed.) The European Parliament in times of EU crisis: dynamics and transformations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan [online], 2019.pages 121-141 – LINK
HILLEBRANDT M. LEINO-SANDBERG P., Administrative and judicial oversight of trilogues, in Journal of European Public Policy, 202128:1, 53-71
LALOUX, T., Designing a collective agent for trilogues in the European Parliament, in DELREUX T., ADRIAENSEN J. (Eds.), The principal agent model and the European Union. Palgrave2, 2017 pp. 83–103
NINATTI S., TANCA A. La natura dei triloghi all’esame del giudice dell’Ue: efficacia versus trasparenza del processo legislativo nel caso De Capitani, in Quaderni costituzionali, 2018, p. 392
OBHOLZER L., REH C., How to Negotiate under Co-decision in the EU Reforming Trilogues and First-Reading Agreements, in CEPS Policy Brief, 8 May 2012
C. REH, Is informal politics undemocratic? Trilogues, early agreements and the selection model of representation, in Journal of European Public Policy, n.6/2014, pp. 822 ss – LINK
ROEDERER-RYNNING, C. AND GREENWOOD, J., The Culture of Trilogues, in Journal of European Public Policy,_ 2015, 1148 – LINK
RUGGE, G. Il ruolo dei triloghi nel processo legislativo dell’UE, in Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea, 2015, p. 809
SALMASO V., I triloghi nel processo decisionale europeo, in Forum Costituzionale, 20 December 2016